On Indirectly Self-defeating Moral Theories

Abstract Derek Parfit has notably argued that while a moral theory should not be directly self-defeating, there is nothing necessarily wrong with a moral theory that is only indirectly self-defeating. Here I resist this line of argument. I argue instead that indirectly self-defeating moral theories...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wiland, Eric (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2008
In: Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2008, Volume: 5, Issue: 3, Pages: 384-393
Further subjects:B Utilitarianism
B SELF-DEFEATING
B PARFIT
B INDIRECT
B DISPOSITION
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1817476785
003 DE-627
005 20220927053014.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220927s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/174552408X369727  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1817476785 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1817476785 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Wiland, Eric  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Wiland, Eric 
245 1 0 |a On Indirectly Self-defeating Moral Theories 
264 1 |c 2008 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract Derek Parfit has notably argued that while a moral theory should not be directly self-defeating, there is nothing necessarily wrong with a moral theory that is only indirectly self-defeating. Here I resist this line of argument. I argue instead that indirectly self-defeating moral theories are indeed problematic. Parfit tries to sidestep the oddities of indirectly self-defeating theories by focusing on the choice of dispositions rather than actions. But the very considerations that can make it impossible to achieve a theory's aims if we try to do what the theory recommends can also make it impossible to achieve a theory's aims if we instead try to adopt the dispositions the theory recommends. What makes a theory indirectly self-defeating has little to do with the object of choice, but with the nature of choosing itself. 
650 4 |a SELF-DEFEATING 
650 4 |a PARFIT 
650 4 |a Utilitarianism 
650 4 |a INDIRECT 
650 4 |a DISPOSITION 
650 4 |a SELF-DEFEATING 
650 4 |a PARFIT 
650 4 |a Utilitarianism 
650 4 |a INDIRECT 
650 4 |a DISPOSITION 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of moral philosophy  |d Leiden : Brill, 2004  |g 5(2008), 3, Seite 384-393  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)474382281  |w (DE-600)2169771-1  |w (DE-576)273875329  |x 1745-5243  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:2008  |g number:3  |g pages:384-393 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/174552408X369727  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/5/3/article-p384_4.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 5  |j 2008  |e 3  |h 384-393 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4192069784 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1817476785 
LOK |0 005 20220927053014 
LOK |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#4EBA048DF644D801EA3A769E8DAA994F0BCFE1CA 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw