Competing Theodicies: The Rabaa Massacre and the Problem of Suffering

The political failure of the Islamist project in Egypt was cemented after the 2013 military coup and subsequent massacre in Rabaa al-Adawiyya Square. For Islamist activists, their cultivation of moral and political agency was directly linked to their understanding of the problem of suffering and God...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Quisay, Walaa (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group 2022
Em: Political theology
Ano: 2022, Volume: 23, Número: 6, Páginas: 576-593
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão:B Egito / Muslimbruderschaft / Rābiʿa-al-ʿAdawiyya-Platz (Kairo) / Massacre / Geschichte 2013 / Teodiceia / Islã / Primavera árabe
Classificações IxTheo:AD Sociologia da religião
BJ Islã
KBL Oriente Médio
NBC Deus
TK Período contemporâneo
Outras palavras-chave:B problem of suffering
B Theodicy
B Rabaa Massacre
B Egypt
B sociodicy
B Muslim Brotherhood
B Arab Spring
Acesso em linha: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrição
Resumo:The political failure of the Islamist project in Egypt was cemented after the 2013 military coup and subsequent massacre in Rabaa al-Adawiyya Square. For Islamist activists, their cultivation of moral and political agency was directly linked to their understanding of the problem of suffering and God's action. This article shows three accounts of theodicy. The first account is a traditional Islamist one exemplified in Sayyid Qutb's theodical interpretation of the story of the Christians of Najran in the Qur'an which affirms otherworldly retribution. The second account is an account of a citizen journalist in which he contends with the silence of God and the devaluation of Islamist theodicies. The final account is that of state theodicy – which has to contend with its “good fortune” thereby creating categories of legitimate suffering. These competing theodicies thus function in creating social and metaphysical structures of suffering and privilege.
ISSN:1743-1719
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: Political theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2022.2047257