Reflections on Wolfart, Challenges to Religious Literacy, and Course Design
Despite its recent prominence as a rationale for the academic study of religion, Professor Wolfart shows both that “religious literacy” has been poorly defined and that little evidence has been adduced for its positive effects. Yet the institutional and social pressures that have led some to embrace...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2022
|
| Dans: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Année: 2022, Volume: 34, Numéro: 5, Pages: 465-474 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Savoir
/ Religion
/ Études de science des religions
/ Pédagogie des religions
/ Planification du cours
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | AA Sciences des religions AH Pédagogie religieuse |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
course design
B introductory courses B Commentaire B Literacy B Religious Literacy |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | Despite its recent prominence as a rationale for the academic study of religion, Professor Wolfart shows both that “religious literacy” has been poorly defined and that little evidence has been adduced for its positive effects. Yet the institutional and social pressures that have led some to embrace religious literacy as a positive argument for the academic study of religion persist, and the essay offers no alternative conception of the broad goals towards which collegiate education about religion should be directed. It is worth considering, therefore, whether some of the flaws with religious literacy as an educational approach might be remedied. In particular, this response proposes that the yawning gap between the abstract goal and the fact that in the U.S. most undergraduates will take only a single course in the study poses a challenge of course design. Carefully designing courses for religious literacy might diminish the imprecision in the concept and provide more tangible evidence of what religiously literate students might be able to do. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Référence: | Kommentar zu "‘Religious Literacy’: Some Considerations and Reservations (2022)"
|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-bja10080 |