The freedom of Christ and the problem of deliberation

Call the claim, common to many in the Christian intellectual tradition, that Christ, in virtue of his created human intellect, had certain, infallible exhaustive foreknowledge the Foreknowledge Thesis. Now consider what I will call the Conditional: If the Foreknowledge Thesis is true, then Christ’s...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pawl, Timothy (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2014
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2014, Volume: 75, Issue: 3, Pages: 233-247
Further subjects:B Deliberation
B Christology
B Freedom
B Foreknowledge
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1821417356
003 DE-627
005 20221110052728.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221110s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-014-9447-4  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1821417356 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1821417356 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Pawl, Timothy  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The freedom of Christ and the problem of deliberation 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Call the claim, common to many in the Christian intellectual tradition, that Christ, in virtue of his created human intellect, had certain, infallible exhaustive foreknowledge the Foreknowledge Thesis. Now consider what I will call the Conditional: If the Foreknowledge Thesis is true, then Christ’s created human will lacked an important sort of freedom that we mere humans have. Insofar as many, perhaps all, of the people who affirm the Foreknowledge Thesis also wish to affirm the robust freedom of Christ’s human will, the truth of the Conditional would be most unwelcome to them. I consider an argument in support of the Conditional from the necessary conditions for deliberation, arguing that the argument fails. 
601 |a Problem 
650 4 |a Deliberation 
650 4 |a Christology 
650 4 |a Freedom 
650 4 |a Foreknowledge 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1970  |g 75(2014), 3, Seite 233-247  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:75  |g year:2014  |g number:3  |g pages:233-247 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1639682104  |k Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709246  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-014-9447-4  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 75  |j 2014  |e 3  |h 233-247 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4208221364 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1821417356 
LOK |0 005 20221110052728 
LOK |0 008 221110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-28#4E721C5BEEBDBED62FBC679071CF477E0A2A6A75 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24709246 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL