Christian materialism in a scientific age
Many Christians who argue against Christian materialism direct their arguments against what I call ‘Type-I materialism’, the thesis that I cannot exist without my organic body. I distinguish Type-I materialism from Type-II materialism, which entails only that I cannot exist without some body that su...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
Idioma: | Inglês |
Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado em: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2011
|
Em: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Ano: 2011, Volume: 70, Número: 1, Páginas: 47-59 |
Outras palavras-chave: | B
First-person perspective
B Incarnation B Intermediate State B Resurrection B Type-I materialism B Technology B Constitutionalism B Type-II materialism |
Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Recurso Electrónico
|
Resumo: | Many Christians who argue against Christian materialism direct their arguments against what I call ‘Type-I materialism’, the thesis that I cannot exist without my organic body. I distinguish Type-I materialism from Type-II materialism, which entails only that I cannot exist without some body that supports certain mental functions. I set out a version of Type-II materialism, and argue for its superiority to Type-I materialism in an age of science. Moreover, I show that Type-II materialism can accommodate Christian doctrines like the Resurrection of the Body, the Incarnation, and the “intermediate state” (if there is one). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1572-8684 |
Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11153-010-9283-0 |