Global Justice and International Business

Little theoretical attention has been paid to the question of what obligations corporations and other business enterprises have to the four billion people living at the base of the global economic pyramid. This article makes several theoretical contributions to this topic. First, it is argued that c...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Arnold, Denis G. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Cambridge Univ. Press 2013
Dans: Business ethics quarterly
Année: 2013, Volume: 23, Numéro: 1, Pages: 125-143
Sujets non-standardisés:B Cosmopolitanism
B Poverty
B Base of the pyramid
B Business Ethics
B Human Rights
B ethical CSR
B Legitimacy
B political CSR
B Rawls
Accès en ligne: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:Little theoretical attention has been paid to the question of what obligations corporations and other business enterprises have to the four billion people living at the base of the global economic pyramid. This article makes several theoretical contributions to this topic. First, it is argued that corporations are properly understood as agents of global justice. Second, the legitimacy of global governance institutions and the legitimacy of corporations and other business enterprises are distinguished. Third, it is argued that a deliberative democracy model of corporate legitimacy defended by theorists of political CSR is unsatisfactory. Fourth, it is argued that a Rawlsian theoretical framework fails to provide a satisfactory account of the obligations of corporations regarding global justice. Finally, an ethical conception of CSR grounded in an appropriately modest set of duties tied to corporate relationships is then defended. This position is cosmopolitan in scope and grounded in overlapping arguments for human rights.
ISSN:2153-3326
Contient:Enthalten in: Business ethics quarterly
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5840/beq20132315