Those were the critics, what about the real readers?
Readings by critics and real readers differ. In biblical studies, published sermons and sermon guidelines provide some of the most important real readings to be analysed empirically. A list of questions is prepared, by means of which sermons can be analysed with a view to the reading strategies that...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
NTWSA
1989
|
| Dans: |
Neotestamentica
Année: 1989, Volume: 23, Numéro: 1, Pages: 61-82 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Theology
B New Testament Bible B Luke 12:35-48 B Reader response criticism B Questions B Christianity |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | Readings by critics and real readers differ. In biblical studies, published sermons and sermon guidelines provide some of the most important real readings to be analysed empirically. A list of questions is prepared, by means of which sermons can be analysed with a view to the reading strategies that they have employed. Sixty-five sermons and sermon guidelines on Luke 12:35-48 are then analysed. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2518-4628 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Neotestamentica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.10520/AJA2548356_328 |