Assessing Rehabilitation Eligibility of Older Patients: An Ethical Analysis of the Impact of Bias

, ABSTRACT:, Hospitalized older patients are more vulnerable to physical or cognitive functional decline. Inpatient rehabilitation programs improve significantly their functional status and may prevent their admission to nursing homes. While inpatient rehabilitation institutions have established adm...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Najem, Josephine (Autor) ; Lam Wai Shun, Priscilla (Autor) ; Laliberté, Maude (Autor) ; Ravitsky, Vardit (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press 2018
En: Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Año: 2018, Volumen: 28, Número: 1, Páginas: 49-84
Acceso en línea: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descripción
Sumario:, ABSTRACT:, Hospitalized older patients are more vulnerable to physical or cognitive functional decline. Inpatient rehabilitation programs improve significantly their functional status and may prevent their admission to nursing homes. While inpatient rehabilitation institutions have established admission criteria that can be seen as objective, the risk of bias remains and raises the question of equitable access for more vulnerable populations such as older patients. This paper reviews some established eligibility criteria for inpatient rehabilitation by examining a framework used in Montreal, Québec, Canada for assessing rehabilitation eligibility and by applying this framework to a case study. It also highlights the unique ethical challenges presented by the assessment of older patients. We conclude that in order to appropriately protect the vulnerable population of older patients in the context of priority setting and allocation of scarce resources, there is a need to establish more specific criteria that can better guide the assessment of this particular population.
ISSN:1086-3249
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1353/ken.2018.0002