What Exactly Did You Claim?: A Call for Clarity in the Presentation of Premises and Conclusions in Philosophical Contributions to Ethics
Philosophers should express their ideas clearly. They should do this in any field of specialization, but especially when they address issues of practical consequence, as they do in bioethics. This article dissects a recent and much-debated contribution to philosophical bioethics by Alberto Giubilini...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2015
|
In: |
Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 24, Issue: 1, Pages: 107-112 |
Further subjects: | B
DESCRIPTIVE
B conclusions B Bioethics B Argumento B Abortion B logical B conceptual B Alberto Giubilini B clarity B premises B Normative B Francesca Minerva B Infanticide B Philosophy B inquisitive |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Philosophers should express their ideas clearly. They should do this in any field of specialization, but especially when they address issues of practical consequence, as they do in bioethics. This article dissects a recent and much-debated contribution to philosophical bioethics by Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva, examines how exactly it fails to meet the requirement of clarity, and maps a way forward by outlining the ways in which philosophical argumentation could validly and soundly proceed in bioethics. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-2147 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0963180114000358 |