On Chickens, Eggs, and the Birthplace of Jesus
In this article, the author challenges the consensus surrounding Jesus’ birth in Bethlehem. This consensus claims the Bethlehem birth was a fabrication posited as messianic fulfilment of Micah 5.2. First, the author summarises the majority position on the issue. Second, the author problematises the...
| Другие заглавия: | Special Issue: Mary Magdalene and Film |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Brill
2022
|
| В: |
Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
Год: 2022, Том: 20, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 218-238 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Jesus Christus
/ Bibel. Lukasevangelium
/ Bibel. Matthäusevangelium
/ Jesus Christ, Geburt Jesu
/ Bibel. Micha 5,2
/ Вифлеем (мотив)
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | HC Новый Завет KAB Раннее христианство |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | In this article, the author challenges the consensus surrounding Jesus’ birth in Bethlehem. This consensus claims the Bethlehem birth was a fabrication posited as messianic fulfilment of Micah 5.2. First, the author summarises the majority position on the issue. Second, the author problematises the notion that there was an expectation regarding Bethlehem as messianic birthplace. Third, the author claims the available evidence might equally suggest Jesus was born in Bethlehem, with Micah 5.2 reinterpreted in light of this. As such, the author calls for renewed discussion about Jesus’ birthplace, and the nature of scholarly argumentation surrounding the issue. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1745-5197 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the historical Jesus
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/17455197-bja10012 |