Religious preferences in healthcare: A welfarist approach
This paper offers a general approach to ethics before considering its implications for the question of how to respond to religious preferences in healthcare, especially those of patients and healthcare workers. The first section outlines the two main components of the approach: (1) demoralizing, tha...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2023
|
| Em: |
Bioethics
Ano: 2023, Volume: 37, Número: 1, Páginas: 5-11 |
| Classificações IxTheo: | AB Filosofia da religião NCB Ética individual NCH Ética da medicina VA Filosofia |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
preferences
B Religião B Religious B Medical Ethics B demoralizing B Welfarism B within healthcare |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Resumo: | This paper offers a general approach to ethics before considering its implications for the question of how to respond to religious preferences in healthcare, especially those of patients and healthcare workers. The first section outlines the two main components of the approach: (1) demoralizing, that is, seeking to avoid moral terminology in the discussion of reasons for action; (2) welfarism, the view that our ultimate reasons are grounded solely in the well-being of individuals. Section 2 elucidates the notion of religious preferences and describes the history and importance of their protection by human rights legislation. The following section defends the ‘Preference Principle’, according to which there is a reason to satisfy any preference (in so far as that satisfaction advances well-being). Section 4 discusses the implications of this principle for religious preferences in healthcare, again seeking to bring out the special social and political importance of respect, and respect for such preferences in particular. The paper ends with a brief description of how to approach such problems from the perspective of a demoralized welfarism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-8519 |
| Reference: | Kritik in "Autonomy, well-being, justice, professional responsibility and personal values: A commentary on Roger Crisp, ‘Religious Preferences in Health Care: A Welfarist Approach’ (2023)"
|
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Bioethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/bioe.13114 |