The Eclipse of Morality: A Riposte to Lane, Wildman, & Shults’ “Paying the Piper” Commentary
The present contribution is a riposte to Lane, Wildman, and Shults’ commentary on my MTSR article “He Who Pays the Piper Calls the Tune” (Ambasciano 2022). I offer an epistemological and historical criticism of some of their most relevant claims, along with the identification and deconstruction of s...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Brill
2023
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Έτος: 2023, Τόμος: 35, Τεύχος: 1, Σελίδες: 87-107 |
| Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών: | B
Μαζικά δεδομένα
/ Ψηφιακές ανθρωπιστικές επιστήμες
/ Μέθοδος
/ Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
/ Επιστημονική ηθική
|
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | ΑΑ Θρησκειολογία ΑΕ Ψυχολογία της θρησκείας NCJ Επιστημονική Ηθική ZG Επιστήμη των ΜΜΕ, Ψηφιακότητα, Επιστήμη της επικοινωνίας |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
CSR 2.0
B cognitive and evolutionary science of religion B Cognitive Historiography B Σχόλιο B method & theory in the qualitative study of history, culture, and religion(s) |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Πιθανολογούμενα δωρεάν πρόσβαση Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Σύνοψη: | The present contribution is a riposte to Lane, Wildman, and Shults’ commentary on my MTSR article “He Who Pays the Piper Calls the Tune” (Ambasciano 2022). I offer an epistemological and historical criticism of some of their most relevant claims, along with the identification and deconstruction of some of the biases and fallacies behind their commentary. I also highlight – once again – the historiographical neglect and some of the most questionable approaches and unresolved issues in the current CSR 2.0 modus operandi. Along with the ethical and financial impact of private donors with political and religious agendas in the field, such controversial topics call for immediate action from peers and associations to avoid the further drain of money, resources, and personnel in a time of increasing financial austerity. A computational science incapable of confronting and resolving such basic issues is not a computational science at all – it’s mere tech-evangelism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Αναφορά: | Kommentar zu "Paying the Piper: History, Humanities, and the Scientific Study of Religion (2023)"
|
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-bja10082 |