Den banala debatten: Hanna Arendt i Jerusalem
Few books within the field of Jewish studies have caused so much anger and intense debate as Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem. A Report on the Banality of Evil. The author was considered to be a self-hating Jew because she accused the Jewish leaders during the Holocaust for having complied with...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Σουηδικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Donner Institute
2001
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Nordisk judaistik
Έτος: 2001, Τόμος: 22, Τεύχος: 2, Σελίδες: 131-156 |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Eichmann, Adolf, 1906-1962
B Arendt, Hannah, 1906-1975 B Jewish literature B Antisemitism in literature B Authors, American B National socialism; Germany B American literature; Jewish authors B Holocaust, Jewish (1939-1945) |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Πιθανολογούμενα δωρεάν πρόσβαση Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Σύνοψη: | Few books within the field of Jewish studies have caused so much anger and intense debate as Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem. A Report on the Banality of Evil. The author was considered to be a self-hating Jew because she accused the Jewish leaders during the Holocaust for having complied with Nazi orders and thus having facilitated the mass murder. Her view of the personality of Eichmann was considered to be wrong, and her way of writing was seen as inappropriate in its lack of humility in dealing with an issue like the Holocaust. Although much of the critique was unfair, Arendt’s non-diplomatic style of writing contributed to the negative reactions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2343-4929 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Nordisk judaistik
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.30752/nj.69585 |