The Formation of Tangut Ideology: Buddhism and Confucianism
This paper examines the issue of the ideological complex of the Tangut Empire (ca. 1038-1227, in Chinese sources known as Xixia 西夏). The focus of the paper is the reconstruction of Tangut ideology as it is reflected in several surviving Tangut compositions. Identifying the Tangut State as either ide...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Brill
2020
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Dynamics in the history of religions
Έτος: 2020, Τόμος: 11, Σελίδες: 123-148 |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
Religion in Asien
B Asien-Studien B Religionswissenschaften B Ostasiatische Geschichte B Ιστορία (μοτίβο) B Zentralasien B Θρησκεία (μοτίβο) |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Πιθανολογούμενα δωρεάν πρόσβαση Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Σύνοψη: | This paper examines the issue of the ideological complex of the Tangut Empire (ca. 1038-1227, in Chinese sources known as Xixia 西夏). The focus of the paper is the reconstruction of Tangut ideology as it is reflected in several surviving Tangut compositions. Identifying the Tangut State as either ideologically Buddhist or Confucian is not really proper from a historical perspective. Instead, the chapter suggests that the core of Tangut ideology was national identity, rather than any specific ideological system. Moreover, it suggests that the core of Tangut self-identification was the idea of Tangut rituals associated with the Tangut writing system. The relative positions of Buddhism and Confucianism are discussed from this perspective. |
|---|---|
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Dynamics in the history of religions
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/9789004417731_007 |