Johannes Polyander and the inefficacious internal call: An Arminian compromise?
In the thirtieth disputation of the Leiden Synopsis (1622), Johannes Polyander elucidates what he considers to be the Reformed doctrine of vocatio. In his explanation of this doctrine, Polyander makes surprising statements concerning the internal call. He teaches that not only the external call, but...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2023
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Scottish journal of theology
Έτος: 2023, Τόμος: 76, Τεύχος: 2, Σελίδες: 112-125 |
| Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών: | B
Polyander a Kerckhoven, Johannes 1568-1646
/ Κλίση <μοτίβο>
/ Αποτελεσματικότητα
/ Μεταρρυθμισμένη Εκκλησία
/ Αρμινιανιστές
|
| Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | KAG Εκκλησιαστική Ιστορία 1500-1648, Μεταρρύθμιση, Ανθρωπισμός, Αναγέννηση KBD Χώρες της Μπενελούξ KDD Ευαγγελική Εκκλησία NBL Δόγμα του Προορισμού |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
internal call
B Reprobation B Leiden Synopsis B Dordt B Arminius B Calling |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Σύνοψη: | In the thirtieth disputation of the Leiden Synopsis (1622), Johannes Polyander elucidates what he considers to be the Reformed doctrine of vocatio. In his explanation of this doctrine, Polyander makes surprising statements concerning the internal call. He teaches that not only the external call, but also the internal call can come to the reprobate. It does not do so all the time, but it does so sometimes, especially in the sphere of the covenant. Yet, when it does, that internal call is ineffectual. This doctrine of an ineffectual internal call is not found in the Canons of Dordt (1618-19), nor in disputations held before the cycle of disputations that became the Leiden Synopsis. Was Polyander's view a compromise with Arminianism? Or was Polyander actually defending Dordt's doctrine? This article builds on Henk van Den Belt's cursory conclusion to this question by providing proof that Polyander was in fact defending Dordt. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-3065 |
| Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0036930622000953 |