Thomas Aquinas on the Metaphysical Structure of Artifacts

It is now standard to interpret Aquinas as recognizing two main types of material objects: substances and artifacts, where substances are those material objects that result from some particular substantial form inhering in prime matter, and artifacts are those material objects that result from some...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Skrzypek, Jeremy W. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2023
Dans: Vivarium
Année: 2023, Volume: 61, Numéro: 2, Pages: 141-166
Sujets non-standardisés:B accidental forms
B Substance
B Thomas Aquinas
B Artifact
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:It is now standard to interpret Aquinas as recognizing two main types of material objects: substances and artifacts, where substances are those material objects that result from some particular substantial form inhering in prime matter, and artifacts are those material objects that result from some particular accidental form inhering in one or more material substances. There are two problems with this standard interpretation. First, there are passages in which Aquinas states that accidental forms should be understood not as inhering in substances from the outside, but as entering into their composition so as to be included among their metaphysical parts. Second, there are passages in which Aquinas states that it is impossible for any accidental form to be shared by two or more substances. This article considers what implications these two observations might have for how we understand the metaphysical structure of artifacts in Aquinas’s ontology.
ISSN:1568-5349
Contient:Enthalten in: Vivarium
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15685349-06102002