Whether and How We Will Continue to Reproduce Ourselves
The author examines two open questions for religious ethicists: whether continuing to have children is a bad idea, given the challenges of antinatalism and climate change, and how we should evaluate the future of reproductive technology. Kao responds to these questions without resolving them by draw...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2023
|
| In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Jahr: 2023, Band: 51, Heft: 4, Seiten: 639-651 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
uterine transplantation
B Social Justice B artificial womb B in vitro fertilization (IVF) B procreative liberty B Surrogacy B pronatalism B Pregnancy B ectogenesis B assisted reproductive technology (ART) B in vitro gametogenesis (IVG) B Reproduction B Climate Change B childfree B antinatalism |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | The author examines two open questions for religious ethicists: whether continuing to have children is a bad idea, given the challenges of antinatalism and climate change, and how we should evaluate the future of reproductive technology. Kao responds to these questions without resolving them by drawing upon human rights, the reproductive justice framework, and principles of social justice. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1467-9795 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/jore.12459 |