Grounding Basic Equality
Although egalitarianism has been the dominant orthodoxy in Anglophone social and political philosophy for many decades, there have been surprisingly few attempts to account for the axiom on which it rests, namely that human moral worth does not come in degrees. This article begins by rehearsing and...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Linköping Univ. Electronic Press
2023
|
| In: |
De Ethica
Year: 2023, Volume: 7, Issue: 4, Pages: 16-34 |
| Further subjects: | B
Monotheism
B Equality B Egalitarianism B Rawls B Kant |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1880110040 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240206155405.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240206s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.237416 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1880110040 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1880110040 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1042763534 |0 (DE-627)769638384 |0 (DE-576)394200039 |4 aut |a Orr, James | |
| 109 | |a Orr, James | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Grounding Basic Equality |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Although egalitarianism has been the dominant orthodoxy in Anglophone social and political philosophy for many decades, there have been surprisingly few attempts to account for the axiom on which it rests, namely that human moral worth does not come in degrees. This article begins by rehearsing and evaluating two families of approaches to the grounding problem. The first favours accounts that seek to preserve consistency with metaphysical naturalism, while the second relies on more philosophically contentious claims about the metaphysical status of the human person. I then outline reasons for supposing that none of these accounts of basic equality offers a convincing theoretical foundation for egalitarianism. I conclude by sketching permutations of a theological account before arguing that one of these variations satisfies many of the explanatory criteria that a successful solution requires. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Kant | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rawls | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Egalitarianism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Equality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Monotheism | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t De Ethica |d Linköping : Linköping Univ. Electronic Press, 2014 |g 7(2023), 4, Seite 16-34 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)797383123 |w (DE-600)2785670-7 |w (DE-576)414831071 |x 2001-8819 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:7 |g year:2023 |g number:4 |g pages:16-34 |
| 856 | |u https://de-ethica.com/article/download/4181/4037 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via page says license)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://de-ethica.com/article/view/4181 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.237416 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 7 |j 2023 |e 4 |h 16-34 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4477954239 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1880110040 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240206155303 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240206||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||