Too Soon or Too Late: Rethinking the Significance of Six Months When Dementia Is a Primary Diagnosis
Cultural narratives shape how we think about the world, including how we decide when the end of life begins. Hospice care has become an integral part of the end-of-life care in the United States, but as it has grown, its policies and practices have also imposed cultural narratives, like those associ...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
Idioma: | Inglês |
Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado em: |
Wiley
2024
|
Em: |
The Hastings Center report
Ano: 2024, Volume: 54, Páginas: S29-S32 |
Outras palavras-chave: | B
cultural narratives
B Hospice B clinical decision-making capacity B six-month rule B clinical ethics |
Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Resumo: | Cultural narratives shape how we think about the world, including how we decide when the end of life begins. Hospice care has become an integral part of the end-of-life care in the United States, but as it has grown, its policies and practices have also imposed cultural narratives, like those associated with the "six-month rule" that the majority of the end of life takes place in the final six months of life. This idea is embedded in policies for a range of care practices and reimbursement processes, even though six months is not always a meaningful marker. In the case of people living with advanced dementia, six months is both too early in the trajectory to facilitate conversations and too late in the trajectory to ensure decision-making capacity. This essay encourages scholars and policy-makers to consider how cultural narratives may limit what they think is possible in care for people living with dementia. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1552-146X |
Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Hastings Center, The Hastings Center report
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1002/hast.1552 |