‘The enemy of my enemy is my enemy’: Markus Barth's awkward hostility to critics of his theology of reconciliation
Markus Barth (1915-1994) is best-known for his pioneering work in Jewish-Christian dialogue, and his Anchor Bible commentaries. Convinced that Ephesians 2:14-16 is the core of Paul's gospel, Barth concluded that the ‘one new man’ in Christ not only necessitates an indissoluble solidarity betwee...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2024
|
| In: |
Scottish journal of theology
Jahr: 2024, Band: 77, Heft: 2, Seiten: 126-137 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Barth, Markus 1915-1994
/ Bibel. Epheserbrief 2,14-16
/ Versöhnung
/ Interreligiöser Dialog
/ Christentum
/ Judentum
/ Konflikt
|
| IxTheo Notationen: | BH Judentum CC Christentum und nichtchristliche Religionen; interreligiöse Beziehungen HC Neues Testament KAJ Kirchengeschichte 1914-; neueste Zeit |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Jewish-Christian dialogue
B Markus Barth B Reconciliation B Supersessionism B the Holocaust |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Markus Barth (1915-1994) is best-known for his pioneering work in Jewish-Christian dialogue, and his Anchor Bible commentaries. Convinced that Ephesians 2:14-16 is the core of Paul's gospel, Barth concluded that the ‘one new man’ in Christ not only necessitates an indissoluble solidarity between Christians and Jews, but entails that all enmities have been negated by Christ's reconciliatory work. Ironically, this conviction provoked in him an antagonism towards many of his Jewish interlocutors. Their refusal to ‘forget Auschwitz’ caused Barth to accuse them of not being sufficiently conciliatory, and in turn led him, with sadly supersessionistic logic, to eschew reconciliation with them, because he did not think they took reconciliation seriously enough. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-3065 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0036930623000674 |