Eusebius of Emesa and the ‘Continuatio Antiochiensis Eusebii’
Richard Burgess, in his Studies in Eusebian and post-Eusebian chronology, argues convincingly for the existence of a hitherto unknown Antiochene continuation of Eusebius' Chronicle. While Burgess does much to advance understanding of fourth-century historiography, his conclusion that this effor...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2015]
|
Στο/Στη: |
The journal of ecclesiastical history
Έτος: 2015, Τόμος: 66, Τεύχος: 3, Σελίδες: 471-487 |
Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών: | B
Continuatio Antiochiensis Eusebii
/ Συγγραφική πατρότητα
/ Eusebius, Emesenus ca. 295/300-ca. 359/360
|
Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | ΚΑΒ Εκκλησιαστική Ιστορία 30-500, Πρώιμος Χριστιανισμός |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Σύνοψη: | Richard Burgess, in his Studies in Eusebian and post-Eusebian chronology, argues convincingly for the existence of a hitherto unknown Antiochene continuation of Eusebius' Chronicle. While Burgess does much to advance understanding of fourth-century historiography, his conclusion that this effort derives from a pro-Nicene author is less convincing than his other arguments. Internal evidence in the fragments themselves, and circumstances surrounding the life of the fourth-century bishop Eusebius of Emesa, point to that prelate as the likely author of the source identified by Burgess. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-7637 |
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: The journal of ecclesiastical history
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0022046915000688 |