Zalabardo on Pritchard and the Evidential Problem

It is an alleged virtue of Pritchard’s Epistemological Disjunctivism (ed) that it makes available a promising line of resistance against the sceptic about perceptual knowledge. According to José Zalabardo’s reconstruction of it, however, this line of resistance—in particular, the solution it supplie...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Piazza, Tommaso 1972- (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Brill 2017
Em: International journal for the study of skepticism
Ano: 2017, Volume: 7, Número: 3, Páginas: 199-205
(Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão:B Zalabardo, José L. 1964- / Pritchard, Duncan 1974-, Epistemological disjunctivism / Epistemologia / Ceticismo / Disjunção lógica (Lógica)
Outras palavras-chave:B Evidential problem epistemological disjunctivism scepticism epistemology of perception Duncan Pritchard José Zalabardo
Acesso em linha: Volltext (Verlag)
Descrição
Resumo:It is an alleged virtue of Pritchard’s Epistemological Disjunctivism (ed) that it makes available a promising line of resistance against the sceptic about perceptual knowledge. According to José Zalabardo’s reconstruction of it, however, this line of resistance—in particular, the solution it supplies to what Pritchard calls the Evidential Problem—is ultimately flawed. Whether or not the solution criticized by Zalabardo is the one supplied by ed—which Pritchard has denied—my aim in this paper is to show that Zalabardo’s criticism of this solution fails. To begin with, I show that it is based on excessively demanding epistemic principles. Moreover, I argue that on a more plausible epistemic principle Zalabardo’s conclusion doesn’t go through.
ISSN:2210-5700
Obras secundárias:In: International journal for the study of skepticism
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/22105700-00001246