Fundamentalismus als „kritische Reaktion“?
Religious fundamentalists think that the basis of their religion and possibly of society is missing. While what they construct and propose as the definite fundament seems less convincing, the diagnosis might contain some truth. Modern atheism, too, is seen as a consequence of an erosion of the funda...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Brill
[2016]
|
| In: |
Interdisciplinary journal for religion and transformation in contemporary society
Year: 2016, 卷: 2, 發布: 2, Pages: 86-106 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
哲學神學
/ 基礎
/ 損失
/ 批評
/ 基要主義
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AD Sociology of religion; religious policy CH Christianity and Society |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| 總結: | Religious fundamentalists think that the basis of their religion and possibly of society is missing. While what they construct and propose as the definite fundament seems less convincing, the diagnosis might contain some truth. Modern atheism, too, is seen as a consequence of an erosion of the fundament or roots, the general outlines of which are the topic of philosophical theology. If both fundamentalismand atheism are critical reactions to a lack of basis, the field of philosophical theology needs to be examined, researching the fate of the fundament. The article proposes hypotheses to this end, like archeologists conduct a test excavation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2364-2807 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Interdisciplinary journal for religion and transformation in contemporary society
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14220/jrat.2016.2.2.86 |