Fundamentalismus als „kritische Reaktion“?

Religious fundamentalists think that the basis of their religion and possibly of society is missing. While what they construct and propose as the definite fundament seems less convincing, the diagnosis might contain some truth. Modern atheism, too, is seen as a consequence of an erosion of the funda...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Riedenauer, Markus 1966- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:German
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill [2016]
In: Interdisciplinary journal for religion and transformation in contemporary society
Year: 2016, Volume: 2, Issue: 2, Pages: 86-106
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Philosophical theology / Foundation / Loss / Criticism / Fundamentalism
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
CH Christianity and Society
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:Religious fundamentalists think that the basis of their religion and possibly of society is missing. While what they construct and propose as the definite fundament seems less convincing, the diagnosis might contain some truth. Modern atheism, too, is seen as a consequence of an erosion of the fundament or roots, the general outlines of which are the topic of philosophical theology. If both fundamentalismand atheism are critical reactions to a lack of basis, the field of philosophical theology needs to be examined, researching the fate of the fundament. The article proposes hypotheses to this end, like archeologists conduct a test excavation.
ISSN:2364-2807
Contains:Enthalten in: Interdisciplinary journal for religion and transformation in contemporary society
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.14220/jrat.2016.2.2.86