In Defense of Comic Pluralism
Jokes are sometimes morally objectionable, and sometimes they are not. Whats the relationship between a jokes being morally objectionable and its being funny? Philosophers answers to this question run the gamut. In this paper I present a new argument for the view that the negative moral value of...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
[2017]
|
| В: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Год: 2017, Том: 20, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 375-392 |
| Индексация IxTheo: | NCA Этика VA Философия |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Юмор (мотив)
B Aesthetic judgment B Comic moralism B Incongruity theory B Comic immoralism |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Итог: | Jokes are sometimes morally objectionable, and sometimes they are not. Whats the relationship between a jokes being morally objectionable and its being funny? Philosophers answers to this question run the gamut. In this paper I present a new argument for the view that the negative moral value of a joke can affect its comedic value both positively and negatively. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8447 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10677-017-9784-3 |