Genetic Virtue Program: An Unfeasible Neo-Pelagian Theodicy?

In his article, "Genetic Engineering, Virtue-First Enhancement, and Neo-Irenaean Theodicy," Mark Walker has ventured farther into science more than most when it comes to exploring theodicy. After exposing the Achilles heel of the traditional free-will defense, Walker develops the Irenaean...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:Moral enhancement and deification through technology?
Main Author: Gouw, Arvin ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge [2018]
In: Theology and science
Year: 2018, Volume: 16, Issue: 3, Pages: 273-278
IxTheo Classification:NBC Doctrine of God
NBE Anthropology
NCJ Ethics of science
Further subjects:B Mark Walker
B Irenaeus
B Theodicy
B Genetic Virtue Program
B Genetics
B Genetic-First-Enhancement
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Summary:In his article, "Genetic Engineering, Virtue-First Enhancement, and Neo-Irenaean Theodicy," Mark Walker has ventured farther into science more than most when it comes to exploring theodicy. After exposing the Achilles heel of the traditional free-will defense, Walker develops the Irenaean and Augustinian responses to the anthropic problem. Most importantly for this discussion, Walker proceeds to propose Genetic-First-Enhancement as part of his neo-Irenaean theodicy formulation. Overall, there are two major concerns I raised: the impossibility of a gradient morality in the presence of free will, and the scientific impossibility of Genetic Virtue Program. However, my claims are falsifiable if future genetic modifications do indeed improve morality. Before that is proven, I agree with Walker that, yes, we should play God, albeit, with his proposed virtue-first program.
ISSN:1474-6719
Contains:Enthalten in: Theology and science
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2018.1488473