Genetic Virtue Program: An Unfeasible Neo-Pelagian Theodicy?
In his article, "Genetic Engineering, Virtue-First Enhancement, and Neo-Irenaean Theodicy," Mark Walker has ventured farther into science more than most when it comes to exploring theodicy. After exposing the Achilles heel of the traditional free-will defense, Walker develops the Irenaean...
Другие заглавия: | Moral enhancement and deification through technology? |
---|---|
Главный автор: | |
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
Routledge
[2018]
|
В: |
Theology and science
Год: 2018, Том: 16, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 273-278 |
Индексация IxTheo: | NBC Бог NBE Антропология NCJ Научная этика |
Другие ключевые слова: | B
Mark Walker
B Irenaeus B Theodicy B Genetic Virtue Program B Genetics B Genetic-First-Enhancement |
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Итог: | In his article, "Genetic Engineering, Virtue-First Enhancement, and Neo-Irenaean Theodicy," Mark Walker has ventured farther into science more than most when it comes to exploring theodicy. After exposing the Achilles heel of the traditional free-will defense, Walker develops the Irenaean and Augustinian responses to the anthropic problem. Most importantly for this discussion, Walker proceeds to propose Genetic-First-Enhancement as part of his neo-Irenaean theodicy formulation. Overall, there are two major concerns I raised: the impossibility of a gradient morality in the presence of free will, and the scientific impossibility of Genetic Virtue Program. However, my claims are falsifiable if future genetic modifications do indeed improve morality. Before that is proven, I agree with Walker that, yes, we should play God, albeit, with his proposed virtue-first program. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1474-6719 |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2018.1488473 |