Masculinities of the Husbands in the Genealogy of Jesus (Matt. 1:2-16)
From a narrative approach, and through the lens of masculinity studies, this article examines a particular group in the genealogy of Jesus: the men associated with a woman in their "begetting": Judah with Tamar, Salmon with Rahab, Boaz with Ruth, and David with the wife of Uriah. What trai...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
[2019]
|
| In: |
Biblical interpretation
Year: 2019, Volume: 27, Issue: 1, Pages: 91-106 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bible. Matthäusevangelium 1,2-16
/ Matthew
/ Masculinity
/ Husband
/ Gender
/ Intertextuality
|
| IxTheo Classification: | FD Contextual theology HC New Testament NBF Christology |
| Further subjects: | B
Masculinity
B Genealogy B Intertextuality B Gender Studies B Gospel of Matthew |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | From a narrative approach, and through the lens of masculinity studies, this article examines a particular group in the genealogy of Jesus: the men associated with a woman in their "begetting": Judah with Tamar, Salmon with Rahab, Boaz with Ruth, and David with the wife of Uriah. What traits characterize this specific group of biblical men put forth as Jesus's ancestors? What kind of husbands and fathers are they? What is the effect on readers as they peruse this list of masculine prototypes? These male figures are then compared to Joseph and to Jesus. The Gospel of Matthew does not present the masculinities of Joseph and Jesus in the same way as it portrays those of others in the genealogy. Basically, the genealogy supports and subverts ancient hegemonic constructions of masculinity, by proposing a reversal of the values associated with masculinity. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5152 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Biblical interpretation
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685152-00271P05 |