Metaphor in argument: The Beelzebul-controversy in the Gospel according to Mark
How do metaphoric texts interact with their argumentative context? After explaining the use and functioning of metaphors in communicative acts, the essay focusses on similes and parables as extended metaphors. Mark 3:22-30 is studied in detail, examining the function of the metaphors used in the arg...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | 電子 Article |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
De Gruyter
[2019]
|
| In: |
Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft
Year: 2019, 卷: 110, 發布: 2, Pages: 133-145 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bibel. Markusevangelium 3,22-30
/ 隱喻
/ 譬喻
/ 論據
/ Beelzebul, 邪靈
|
| IxTheo Classification: | CD Christianity and Culture HC New Testament NBH Angelology; demonology |
| Further subjects: | B
逻辑论证
B Holy Spirit B 明喻 B Lord of the House B Jesus B Beelzebul B Parable B Temptation B Mark 3:22-30 B Satan B Metaphor |
| 在線閱讀: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| 總結: | How do metaphoric texts interact with their argumentative context? After explaining the use and functioning of metaphors in communicative acts, the essay focusses on similes and parables as extended metaphors. Mark 3:22-30 is studied in detail, examining the function of the metaphors used in the argumentative dispute. The example shows that parables and similes can have different functions in arguments. As comparative illustration, they can support the argument, but the solution of the dispute can also be expressed in metaphor only. In both cases however, metaphoric speech is based on analogy and servient to the surrounding argument. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1613-009X |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/znw-2019-0010 |