Paulinisches Marketing zwischen Inkulturation und Ironie. Argumentationsstrategien in der Areopagrede (Apg 17,22b–31)
This contribution discusses the understanding of inculturation that is operative for Luke’s Paul in the Areopagus speech. It combines philological analysis of conspicuous features of the text with an evaluation of archeological data to situate the Areopagus speech within the socio-cultural context o...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | German |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill, Ferdinand Schöningh
[2019]
|
In: |
Biblische Zeitschrift
Year: 2019, Volume: 63, Issue: 2, Pages: 220-261 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Roman Empire
/ Acropolis (Athens)
/ Paul Apostle
/ Inculturation
/ Irony
|
IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament |
Further subjects: | B
Inculturation
B κρίνω B Areopag B antiimperiale Auslegung B Acts of the Apostles B Roma-Augustus-Monopteros |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | This contribution discusses the understanding of inculturation that is operative for Luke’s Paul in the Areopagus speech. It combines philological analysis of conspicuous features of the text with an evaluation of archeological data to situate the Areopagus speech within the socio-cultural context of Athens. An interpretation of verse 31 is proposed that does not include reference to an eschatological event and which could help to clarify the often discussed soteriological and christological difficulties of the argumention. Thus it becomes evident that the adopted stance of the Lukan Paul before the Areopagus is marked by ironic inversions and anti-imperial critique. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2589-0468 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Biblische Zeitschrift
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.30965/25890468-06302003 |