Paulinisches Marketing zwischen Inkulturation und Ironie. Argumentationsstrategien in der Areopagrede (Apg 17,22b–31)
This contribution discusses the understanding of inculturation that is operative for Luke’s Paul in the Areopagus speech. It combines philological analysis of conspicuous features of the text with an evaluation of archeological data to situate the Areopagus speech within the socio-cultural context o...
Auteur principal: | |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Allemand |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Brill, Ferdinand Schöningh
[2019]
|
Dans: |
Biblische Zeitschrift
Année: 2019, Volume: 63, Numéro: 2, Pages: 220-261 |
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Römisches Reich
/ Akropolis Athen (Athen)
/ Paulus, Apostel, Heiliger
/ Inculturation
/ Ironie
|
Classifications IxTheo: | HC Nouveau Testament |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Inculturation
B κρίνω B Areopagrede B Areopag B antiimperiale Auslegung B Roma-Augustus-Monopteros |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | This contribution discusses the understanding of inculturation that is operative for Luke’s Paul in the Areopagus speech. It combines philological analysis of conspicuous features of the text with an evaluation of archeological data to situate the Areopagus speech within the socio-cultural context of Athens. An interpretation of verse 31 is proposed that does not include reference to an eschatological event and which could help to clarify the often discussed soteriological and christological difficulties of the argumention. Thus it becomes evident that the adopted stance of the Lukan Paul before the Areopagus is marked by ironic inversions and anti-imperial critique. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2589-0468 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Biblische Zeitschrift
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.30965/25890468-06302003 |