Religion: costs, signals, and the Neolithic transition

This paper extends the picture developed in Religion Re-Explained (Sterelny, 2018) to groups in transition from egalitarian to inegalitarian social environments, “big men” societies and their archaeological equivalents. It begins by giving a more nuanced account of the relationship between signals,...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sterelny, Kim 1950- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge [2020]
In: Religion, brain & behavior
Year: 2020, Volume: 10, Issue: 3, Pages: 303-320
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Neolithic revolution / Signal / Communication / Religion / Evolution
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
AE Psychology of religion
Further subjects:B honest signaling
B transegalitarian societies
B Ritual
B costly signaling
B Costly signaling model of religion
B Neolithic transition
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Summary:This paper extends the picture developed in Religion Re-Explained (Sterelny, 2018) to groups in transition from egalitarian to inegalitarian social environments, “big men” societies and their archaeological equivalents. It begins by giving a more nuanced account of the relationship between signals, rituals, and costs, showing that the costly signaling model of religion is best seen as a family of models. These vary in the extent to which they scale from smaller to larger social worlds. Some are scale-independent; others can be scaled up, but only by overcoming increasingly difficult signal broadcast problems; one is an intrinsically small scale intimate social world model. These issues of scalability are then integrated with transformations in the character and function of ritual and belief, as ritual becomes an instrument for competitive interactions within and across groups, and an expression of unequal status and power, while also retaining in important ways earlier roles of mediating social cohesion. Changes in ritual were both a mechanism and an expression of the shift to a less equal social world.
ISSN:2153-5981
Contains:Enthalten in: Religion, brain & behavior
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2019.1678513