»Jesus, der Christus« – von der Lehrformel zur Leerformel: Eine kritische Replik auf Christian Danz

In his recent book »Jesus von Nazareth zwischen Judentum und Christentum« (2020) Christian Danz gives a full account of his so-called »hermeneutics of difference« as an approach in the theology of religions that is allegedly more pluralism-friendly than the different versions of exclusivism, inclusi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Schmidt-Leukel, Perry 1954- (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Deutsch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Mohr Siebeck [2020]
In: Theologische Rundschau
Jahr: 2020, Band: 85, Heft: 4, Seiten: 393-415
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In his recent book »Jesus von Nazareth zwischen Judentum und Christentum« (2020) Christian Danz gives a full account of his so-called »hermeneutics of difference« as an approach in the theology of religions that is allegedly more pluralism-friendly than the different versions of exclusivism, inclusivism and pluralism. Although this claim is illustrated primarily by the example of Christian-Jewish relations, its implications are of a general nature. This paper analyses the hermeneutical foundations of Danz' position as a form of theological antirealism that understands theological statements not as referring to any external realities but takes them exclusively as expressions of the Christian faith. As such they do not, according to Danz, entail any assessment of other religions at all. The paper criticises Danz' position as untenable because of its inner contradictions, as incompatible with the factual truth claims inevitably implied by the Christian faith and as possibly a version of covert atheism. Danz' critique of religious pluralism as monistic, implausible, irreconcilable with the religions' self-understanding and ruinous to Christology is rejected, while pluralism is defended as a far more robust, rewarding - and in a sense more traditional - approach to other religions than Danz' hermeneutics of difference.DANZ, Jesus von Nazareth zwischen Judentum und Christentum. Eine christologische und religionstheologische Skizze. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen 2020, IX + 289 S.
ISSN:1868-727X
Enthält:Enthalten in: Theologische Rundschau
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1628/thr-2020-0021