Moral Responsibility and History Revisited
Compatibilists about determinism and moral responsibility disagree with one another about the bearing of agents’ histories on whether or not they are morally responsible for some of their actions. Some stories about manipulated agents prompt such disagreements. In this article, I call attention to s...
Autore principale: | |
---|---|
Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
Lingua: | Inglese |
Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Pubblicazione: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2008
|
In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Anno: 2008, Volume: 12, Fascicolo: 5, Pagine: 463 |
Altre parole chiave: | B
Moral Responsibility
B Compatibilism B Manipolazione B History B Responsibility for character |
Accesso online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Riepilogo: | Compatibilists about determinism and moral responsibility disagree with one another about the bearing of agents’ histories on whether or not they are morally responsible for some of their actions. Some stories about manipulated agents prompt such disagreements. In this article, I call attention to some of the main features of my own “history-sensitive” compatibilist proposal about moral responsibility, and I argue that arguments advanced by Michael McKenna and Manuel Vargas leave that proposal unscathed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1572-8447 |
Comprende: | Enthalten in: Ethical theory and moral practice
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s10677-008-9131-9 |