Persona nella discussione interconfessionale
Today's interconfessional splits go back to the Fathers. Cyril of Alexandria's ontological approach completes Nestorius' and the Syriac phenomenological approach; Boethius is corrected by Thomas. De Régnon's paradigm is now questioned. Y. Zizioulas passes from the patristic perso...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | Italian |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Lateran Univ. Press
2021
|
| In: |
Lateranum
Year: 2021, Volume: 87, Issue: 2, Pages: 399-410 |
| IxTheo Classification: | KDB Roman Catholic Church KDD Protestant Church KDJ Ecumenism NBF Christology |
| Further subjects: | B
interconfessional dialogue
B dialogo interconfessionale B Persona B patristica B Patristics B Person |
| Summary: | Today's interconfessional splits go back to the Fathers. Cyril of Alexandria's ontological approach completes Nestorius' and the Syriac phenomenological approach; Boethius is corrected by Thomas. De Régnon's paradigm is now questioned. Y. Zizioulas passes from the patristic person to personalism. Cyril'approach; Syriac approach; de Régnon; Zizioulas. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1010-7215 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Lateranum
|