Constitution, identity, and the Trinity: rebuttal to Leftow
Brian Leftow continues to argue that the metaphysical concept of constitution cannot be used to explicate the doctrine of the Trinity, as I have attempted to do. He also defends his own, distinctive view of the relation of Jesus to the Father. I maintain that he fails on both counts.
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2023
|
| Em: |
Religious studies
Ano: 2023, Volume: 59, Número: 1, Páginas: 165-172 |
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Trindade
/ Constituição (Filosofia)
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | AB Filosofia da religião NBC Deus |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Leftow
B Trinity B Divine Nature B Constitution B Personal Identity |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Resumo: | Brian Leftow continues to argue that the metaphysical concept of constitution cannot be used to explicate the doctrine of the Trinity, as I have attempted to do. He also defends his own, distinctive view of the relation of Jesus to the Father. I maintain that he fails on both counts. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Reference: | Kritik von "Can the constitution be saved? (2023)"
|
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412522000178 |