A New Moral Argument for the existence of God

I offer a new deductive formulation of the Moral Argument for the existence of God which shows how one might argue for the conclusion that, if one affirms moral realism (traditionally understood as a metaethical view which acknowledges the existence of objective moral truths), one should affirm thei...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Loke, Andrew Ter Ern (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Springer Nature B. V 2023
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Jahr: 2023, Band: 93, Heft: 1, Seiten: 25-38
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Moralischer Gottesbeweis / Moralischer Realismus / Moralität / Pflicht / Ontologie / Deduktion
IxTheo Notationen:AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus
NBC Gotteslehre
NCA Ethik
VA Philosophie
VB Logik; philosophische Hermeneutik; philosophische Erkenntnislehre
weitere Schlagwörter:B Theistic metaethics
B Moral argument
B Euthyphro dilemma
B Moral ontology
B Moral Obligation
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:I offer a new deductive formulation of the Moral Argument for the existence of God which shows how one might argue for the conclusion that, if one affirms moral realism (traditionally understood as a metaethical view which acknowledges the existence of objective moral truths), one should affirm theism. The new formulation shows that these objective moral truths are either brute facts, or they are metaphysically grounded in an impersonal entity, a non-divine personal entity, or a divine personal entity i.e., God. I illustrate how the alternatives to God can in principle be excluded based on the essential characteristics of those alternative hypotheses and of certain objective moral truths. I demonstrate that my deductive formulation is better than other formulations, and that it is helpful for future work on the Moral Argument.
ISSN:1572-8684
Enthält:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-022-09842-1