Vexed Issues on Evolution in Christianity and Islam: A Comparison
In response to Shoaib Malik's Islam and Evolution, this paper compares Christian and Muslim views on six oft perceived conflicts between neo-Darwinian evolution and religion. These concern (1) holy scripture and hermeneutics, (2) evolutionary evil, (3) human uniqueness (4) human origins, (5) di...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 其他作者: | |
| 格式: | 電子 Review |
| 語言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 載入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Routledge
2023
|
| In: |
Theology and science
Year: 2023, 卷: 21, 發布: 4, Pages: 678-695 |
| Review of: | Islam and evolution (London : Routledge, 2021) (Brink, Gijsbert van den)
|
| IxTheo Classification: | BJ Islam CF Christianity and Science KDD Protestant Church NBD Doctrine of Creation NBE Anthropology |
| Further subjects: | B
書評
B Islam and science B Adam and Eve B scripture and hermeneutics B Reformed Theology B human uniqueness B evolutionary theory B chance and providence B evolutionary evil |
| 在線閱讀: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| 總結: | In response to Shoaib Malik's Islam and Evolution, this paper compares Christian and Muslim views on six oft perceived conflicts between neo-Darwinian evolution and religion. These concern (1) holy scripture and hermeneutics, (2) evolutionary evil, (3) human uniqueness (4) human origins, (5) divine providence in relation to evolutionary chance, and (6) the origins of religion. Whereas stunning similarities surface, we also find remarkable differences, which lead to some questions for Malik. These pertain to the status of the Qu‘ran, the seriousness of evolutionary suffering, and the possible consequences of neo-Darwinian evolution for theological anthropology and the doctrine of revelation. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1474-6719 |
| Reference: | Kritik in "Defending ‘Islam and Evolution: Al-Ghazālī and the Modern Evolutionary Paradigm': Abrahamic Dialogues and Interdisciplinary Insights (2023)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2023.2255951 |