Jer 25,1-14 im masoretischen und im alexandrinischen Text des Jeremiabuchs: ein Gespräch mit Shimon Gesundheit
The article casts doubt on Shimon Gesundheit's theory, published in this journal (VT 62 [2012] 29-57), that in the case of Jer 25,1-14—contrary to mainstream scholarly opinion—the Masoretic text form commands priority over the edition represented by the LXX. Even though Gesundheit's approa...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
[2019]
|
| In: |
Vetus Testamentum
Year: 2019, Volume: 69, Issue: 2, Pages: 277-306 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bible. Jeremia 25,1-14
/ Journalistic editing
/ Textual criticism
/ Gesundheit, Shimon 1961-
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
Jer 25,1-14
B Book of Jeremiah B Exegetical Method B Textual Criticism B redaction history B ancient scribalism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | The article casts doubt on Shimon Gesundheit's theory, published in this journal (VT 62 [2012] 29-57), that in the case of Jer 25,1-14—contrary to mainstream scholarly opinion—the Masoretic text form commands priority over the edition represented by the LXX. Even though Gesundheit's approach is basically sound, his results fail to convince. The conclusions drawn from a diachronic analysis of the passage hold wider implications for the redaction history of the book of Jeremiah, the working philosophies of the ancient tradents of the book, and exegetical method in general. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5330 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Vetus Testamentum
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685330-12341358 |