Jer 25,1-14 im masoretischen und im alexandrinischen Text des Jeremiabuchs: ein Gespräch mit Shimon Gesundheit
The article casts doubt on Shimon Gesundheit's theory, published in this journal (VT 62 [2012] 29-57), that in the case of Jer 25,1-14—contrary to mainstream scholarly opinion—the Masoretic text form commands priority over the edition represented by the LXX. Even though Gesundheit's approa...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Brill
[2019]
|
| В: |
Vetus Testamentum
Год: 2019, Том: 69, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 277-306 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Bibel. Jeremia 25,1-14
/ Редакция (журнализм)
/ Текстовая критика
/ Gesundheit, Shimon 1961-
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | HB Ветхий Завет |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Jer 25,1-14
B Book of Jeremiah B Exegetical Method B Textual Criticism B redaction history B ancient scribalism |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | The article casts doubt on Shimon Gesundheit's theory, published in this journal (VT 62 [2012] 29-57), that in the case of Jer 25,1-14—contrary to mainstream scholarly opinion—the Masoretic text form commands priority over the edition represented by the LXX. Even though Gesundheit's approach is basically sound, his results fail to convince. The conclusions drawn from a diachronic analysis of the passage hold wider implications for the redaction history of the book of Jeremiah, the working philosophies of the ancient tradents of the book, and exegetical method in general. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5330 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Vetus Testamentum
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685330-12341358 |