The 'Heaven Ab Initio' Argument from Evil
Logical and evidential arguments from evil are generally thought to have been rebutted by various refutations, defenses, and theodicies. While disparate, these responses employ similar strategies to show that God has morally sufficient reasons to permit evil and suffering in the world, either to pre...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
MDPI
2023
|
In: |
Religions
Jahr: 2023, Band: 14, Heft: 2 |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
James Sterba
B Heaven B Evil B John Mackie B Alvin Plantinga B Deism |
Online Zugang: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Zusammenfassung: | Logical and evidential arguments from evil are generally thought to have been rebutted by various refutations, defenses, and theodicies. While disparate, these responses employ similar strategies to show that God has morally sufficient reasons to permit evil and suffering in the world, either to preserve human freedom, for the sake of the moral growth of human souls, or to train humans to be able to act freely without sinning once in heaven. In this paper, I defend the heaven ab initio argument from evil (HAIAFE), which demonstrates that God could have accomplished all these goals, without the need for evil and suffering, by creating human beings directly as spiritual beings in a non-physical state of eternal bliss. Moreover, I will argue that the HAIAFE is both a logical argument from evil and a “deodicy”, i.e., a vindication of a deistic god. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2077-1444 |
Enthält: | Enthalten in: Religions
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.3390/rel14020200 |