Las incertidumbres históricas sobre la potestad pontificia de disolver un matrimonio rato y no consumado: una clave interpretativa de la formación del vínculo matrimonial
Papal power to dissolve a non-consummated marriage was established mainly during the pontificates of Popes Alexander III and Innocent III. Since the beginning, this institution has faced significant objections from both theologians and canonists. First, this article focuses on the elements required...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
HeinOnline
2016
|
| In: |
Ius canonicum
Year: 2016, Volume: 56, Issue: 111, Pages: 229-269 |
| Further subjects: | B
Potestad papal
B indisolubilidad del matrimonio B disolución del matrimonio rato y no consumado B Decreto de Graciano B teoría del consentimiento B teoría de la cópula |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Papal power to dissolve a non-consummated marriage was established mainly during the pontificates of Popes Alexander III and Innocent III. Since the beginning, this institution has faced significant objections from both theologians and canonists. First, this article focuses on the elements required for an adequate understanding of such papal authority, including the underlying sacramental theology of marriage. Second, a historical overview of the origin and evolution of this power will be outlined, setting the so-called «consent theory» and «coital theory» in their proper context. Special attention will be paid to the distinction between matrimonium initiatum and matrimonium ratum in the Decretum Gratiani, taking into account the different stages of its composition. Finally, there is a brief discussion of the degree to which such papal authority is coherent with the indissolubility of marriage. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2254-6219 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Ius canonicum
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.15581/016.111.229-269 |